Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #163, comment 3


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 18, 2016, 12:58:49 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
dmik
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #163, comment 3

    initial v1  
    1 There are no bugs in the Qt readme — you should not mix manual ZIP installations with RPMs. Also, Qt4 RPMs work just fine with gcc RPM v4.9.2. Perhaps, you somehow killed the EMXOMFLD_ variables that the `gcc-wlink` and `gcc-wrc` RPM packages should have added to your CONFIG.SYS. The thing is that `qt4-devel-kit` doesn't automatically install `gcc-wlink` or `gcc-wrc` but that's not a bug because technically you may want to use ILINK instead of WLINK (however, this doesn't make any sense nowadays). Anyway, this is not a problem of Qt, this is a GCC thing. But ILINK is proprietary so I don't think we can make an RPM for it. We perhaps should install `gcc-wlink` and `gcc-wrc` by default whenever `gcc` is installed. I created #164 for that.
     1There are no bugs in the Qt readme — you should not mix manual ZIP installations with RPMs. Also, Qt4 RPMs work just fine with gcc RPM v4.9.2. Perhaps, you somehow killed the EMXOMFLD_ variables that the `gcc-wlink` and `gcc-wrc` RPM packages should have added to your CONFIG.SYS (or don't have these packages installed). The thing is that `qt4-devel-kit` doesn't automatically install `gcc-wlink` or `gcc-wrc` but that's not a bug because technically you may want to use ILINK instead of WLINK (however, this doesn't make any sense nowadays). Anyway, this is not a problem of Qt, this is a GCC thing. But ILINK is proprietary so I don't think we can make an RPM for it. We perhaps should install `gcc-wlink` and `gcc-wrc` by default whenever `gcc` is installed. I created #164 for that.