Custom Query (344 matches)
Results (100 - 102 of 344)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#57 | invalid | yum update failure - perl | ||
Description |
Attempting to update perl and I receive: [d:\]yum update Setting up Update Process Error: Package tuple ('perl', 'i386', '0', '5.16.1', '0.7.oc00') could not be found in rpmdb Tried: yum clean packages yum clean metadata yum clean all then a: yum check-update which shows (same results from Netlabs servers): cpio.i386 2.11-4.oc00 netlabs-rel-2rosenthals gawk.i386 4.0.0-2.oc00 netlabs-rel-2rosenthals libc.i386 0.6.5-16.oc00 netlabs-rel-2rosenthals libc-devel.i386 0.6.5-16.oc00 netlabs-rel-2rosenthals perl.i386 5.16.1-0.8.oc00 netlabs-exp-2rosenthals perl-libs.i386 5.16.1-0.8.oc00 netlabs-exp-2rosenthals |
|||
#61 | invalid | Add source rpm repo | ||
Description |
It would be a major help to developers to have source rpms with diffs for building the OS/2 versions of things (which would hopefully save us some duplication of effort. Example: I am currently trying to build Info-ZIP's unzip version 6.10b. The OS/2 makefile is hopelessly outdated (very little pertains to libc gcc vs emx), and I am slowly - with much help - plodding my way through the sources to make the necessary edits to get it to build properly under gcc 4.4.6. If I had the diffs for the current unzip 6.0 within easy reach, it would make the task much easier. And Yuri, thanks again for all of your efforts. My own building has come along by leaps and bounds since I started getting comfortable with all of this on OS/2. Great job. |
|||
#62 | invalid | Rpm2cpio | ||
Description |
Hi Yuri, If i try to do rpm2cpio i get a strange out put like:
M:\test>rpm2cpio file-5.04-6.oc00.src.rpm
07070127c5e95f000081e40000000000000000000000014c751bba00097b31000000560000004400000000000000000000001100000000file-5.04.tar.gz eö\Ký}¨cÔF▓¹€³¢ÿ
p8|gbÃ┘0{ÏÓÒO2Yý╚[; ▒ÆæÖy¹WGw½%÷╔¯{▀╬nH¦€WuUuuCwõTÀj½ø§│Vc ¿§_└┐Á€€ÝÝM±_½Ùø½ã'²[█X¦Zkkkø[[█½kk½n╗╣■_ ¨¸Ã [Y╝bÞÏPZ+ïª?█Ì@¼¼õ~,-ùEß ý╚
Æò;▒V█\Ù½½▀€WÎÙkøbmkgm{g}S¶o7î³P┤&óÉ╦Á¬c█ÝÞþ?┌a°¡´ÅsGã§nDÌýPË?Äj7¸¶2wzÙ{ðõ¥/<?╬ØÒëÞͧÌ
┼$o{\]║▀À├[ äÐ_r╣s| ?â╩vÞê¡┌┬j█×ÏÀâ{Î+åóȸ'Åü{sëk 9Ç×.|│»GN9ºfº¤│S‗╬ BθttÙê0éWv0y,×Wàiz;«7}¿õVv¸+·P#ßc9Ò░&J]èë§oG0ÔQÝ6O§«¾`¸#╚
+°øãK´ëkGLCg «┼LA¶¿0$d
`Ï6@Ãíé¡BËüÒ▄#ÖQöqÞÅF■=O‗Ù¯!4ãÔƒ╣»#sçþ¶ ~#ä!{¶÷╠ ;Þ▀èʤ▀û5}òtþo½Çº¯d│Í[▀©╠Ú┼åü{&▒SÆ║§ÙÆ* █.ý├±└╦╬ ÚÖ┌#@T‗ÿ±'b LðQ®p╠aÇYL³{'¿ëúG€┼▄ óPÈÃÊ─¸@öü▀ƒÔZ:ârN5ä#%Ëd¼´Lp╚╝°Qv┌¢qÉ╣┤=a.Ó 5aß▄┬ä\O¦ájÓÅaõ߶ÜÐ▀óî(Þþ:AÚ»Ç 0±æÒ┘HX¯,w4╚Ël£▓> *2á©Ç»P3á0úâaÞÌx░Þ╚BábÞÐæü┘ÈÌ39DG└ Is this normal?? I thought we should see a other normal output. Same behavior if i use rpm2cpio - < myrpmfile.rpm |