Custom Query (344 matches)
Results (43 - 45 of 344)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #103 | fixed | libc-devel 0.6.6 ansidecl.h conflicts with version in binutils-devel 2.21-1 | ||
| Description |
I needed to uninstall binutils-devel in order to upgrade libc-devel: Transaction Check Error:
c00.i386 conflicts with file from package libc-devel-0.6.6-22.oc00.i386 Looks like we need to update binutils-devel (without getting to the libelf vs BFD thing). |
|||
| #104 | wontfix | Group tag standardization | ||
| Description |
As our collection of packages has grown, the need for better organization has become greater. Most of our packages utilize the Group tag, but I'm not clear as to what standard we follow. For example, Fedora has an optional Group tag, and few explicit categories, while openSUSE has a much more detailed list. Mageia has yet a different set of standard group tags. Some other packages of ours (virtual ones, such as the netlabs-rel, netlabs-exp, os2-base, os2-mpts) have no group tag at all. YUMIE (still under development) has the ability to filter the package list based upon group, so this is a working example of where these tags will be used. I'm happy to add the necessary page to the rpm wiki here once we agree on a reasonable standard (and it doesn't have to be one of the existing ones; for example, I would suggest a group of "Virtual" for the virtual packages). |
|||
| #105 | fixed | Description in netlabs-rel.spec is incorrect | ||
| Description |
Just noticed that the descriptions was copied/pasted from netlabs-exp.repo, and included the same warning about packages not being considered stable. I'm unsure as to the accepted practice for changing release number for fixes like this (nothing changed in the package). I've bumped the release, just in case. Diff attached. |
|||
