#196 closed defect (fixed)
Git bisect does not accept revisions
Reported by: | dryeo | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Feedback pending | Milestone: | |
Component: | git | Version: | |
Severity: | medium | Keywords: | |
Cc: | dave.r.yeo@… |
Description
Attempting to use git bisect always fails when trying to enter the good revision. For example, a session,
[C:\work\cc45esr\mozilla]sh # git bisect start # git bisect bad # git bisect good 69cd3cf7204047ed79c3a5d6d35fe75b09e0e94e revision is needed # git bisect good FIREFOX_45_5_0esr_RELEASE_OS2_Beta_8 revision is needed # git bisect good 7674a41 revision is needed #
Attachments (2)
Change History (14)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Not sure how to debug. Running git bisect good 69cd3cf7204047ed79c3a5d6d35fe75b09e0e94e results in the attached. Running sh -x -c git-bisect.sh bad 69cd3cf7204047ed79c3a5d6d35fe75b09e0e94e results in
+ k:/usr/libexec/git-core/git-bisect 22:59:08.415000 git.c:371 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-dir' 22:59:08.585000 git.c:371 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--show-cdup' 22:59:08.658000 git.c:371 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'objects' usage: git bisect [help|start|bad|good|new|old|terms|skip|next|reset|visualize|replay|log|run]
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
I more thought of adding some printf to the shell script and see what it does and if it makes sense at all.
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
did you try to add some printf in the shell to see it it makes any sense?
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Priority: | major → Feedback pending |
---|
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
I couldn't make heads or tails of the shell script enough to get anywhere with printf or echo.
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Testing with an older version of the script (pre-RPM) does work,
C:\work\cc45esr\mozilla>git bisect start C:\work\cc45esr\mozilla>git bisect bad C:\work\cc45esr\mozilla>git bisect good 69cd3cf7204047ed79c3a5d6d35fe75b09e0e94e Bisecting: 84 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps) [d1b5622450e335c0bf41bb84dafe6146019bf466] #402: M1365602
The script is about 6kb smaller.
comment:8 by , 5 years ago
just using the older script? or also with a older (pre-rpm) git? I wonder if the script got broken or what. If only using a older script works, please do a diff and see what it might be.
We are not actively working on git atm, so every hint you have might speed it up.
by , 5 years ago
Attachment: | git-bisect.diff added |
---|
Diff between current git-bisect script and one from the bauxite git release.
comment:9 by , 5 years ago
Just using the older script. The diff is bigger then the scripts, so hard to see what might have changed. I should try downgrading git and compare the scripts, perhaps can get a smaller diff. It's bedtime here so will have to wait.
I'll attach the diff.
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
in write_terms () around line 570 is the following:
printf '%s\n%s\n' "$TERM_BAD" "$TERM_GOOD" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS"
change to:
printf '%s\n%s\n' "$TERM_BAD" "$TERM_GOOD" | tr -d '\r' >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS"
means add
| tr -d '\r'
This should fix it. please try.
comment:11 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
you need to debug git-bisect in /@unixroot/libexec/git-core and see where it starts to give up.