Custom Query (344 matches)

pthread-devel should depend on pthread. In the current spec file this is not the case.

The group is unspecified for the above. This is consistent with Fedora's packaging, apparently. Should we set a tag? poppler is in the Development/Libraries group.

Should matters like this be reported upstream instead? Honestly, we have enough to worry about. LOL

Dependencies fail for png16.dll as this is present in earlier package (libpng-1.6.10-1) but in the most recent (1.6.14-1), the dll is incorrectly named png1616.dll.

I ended up in a loop trying to update, and initially thought that it was as a result of an arch change. Upon closer inspection, I got:

Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libpng.pentium4 0:1.6.10-1.oc00 will be updated
--> Processing Dependency: png16.dll for package: 1:cups-ibs-1.4.8-0.oc00.pentium4
--> Processing Dependency: png16.dll for package: 1:cups-1.4.8-0.oc00.pentium4
---> Package libpng.pentium4 0:1.6.14-1.oc00 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:cups-libs-1.4.8-0.oc00.pentium4 (@netlabs-exp)
           Requires: png16.dll
           Removing: libpng-1.6.10-1.oc00.pentium4 (@netlabs-rel)
               png16.dll
           Updated By: libpng-1.6.14-1.oc00.pentium4 (netlabs-exp)
               Not found
Error: Package: 1:cups-1.4.8-0.oc00.pentium4 (@netlabs-exp)
           Requires: png16.dll
           Removing: libpng-1.6.10-1.oc00.pentium4 (@netlabs-rel)
               png16.dll
           Updated By: libpng-1.6.14-1.oc00.pentium4 (netlabs-exp)
               Not found
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

Oops.