Custom Query (301 matches)
Results (130 - 132 of 301)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#178 | fixed | Poor QNetworkDiskCache performance | ||
Description |
Not sure if we should do this kind of things, because it's a multiplatform issue. Even though it probably hurts most on OS/2 (see also #176). Find attached a patch to improve the performance of QNetworkDiskCache::expire(). It avoids to stat() cache files before they get deleted. It sees to futher improve Arora browser's behavior. |
|||
#177 | fixed | QProcess::startDetached() fails to pass arguments | ||
Description |
In some cases arguments are not passed correctly to the child process. The reason is than QByteArray::size() does not count the trailing zero. Thus the argument strings might be unterminated. Index: qprocess_os2.cpp =================================================================== --- qprocess_os2.cpp (revision 758) +++ qprocess_os2.cpp (working copy) @@ -993,12 +993,12 @@ // DosStartSession() as it cannot work with high memory PSZ pgmNameLow = (PSZ)::_lmalloc(::strlen(programReal) + 1); ::strcpy(pgmNameLow, programReal); - PSZ argsLow = (PSZ)::_lmalloc(args.size()); - ::memcpy(argsLow, args, args.size()); + PSZ argsLow = (PSZ)::_lmalloc(args.size() + 1); + ::memcpy(argsLow, args, args.size() + 1); PSZ envLow = 0; if (!env.isEmpty()) { - envLow = (PSZ)::_lmalloc(env.size()); - ::memcpy(envLow, env, env.size()); + envLow = (PSZ)::_lmalloc(env.size() + 1); + ::memcpy(envLow, env, env.size() + 1); } #else PSZ pgmNameLow = (PSZ)programReal; |
|||
#176 | fixed | Extremly poor performance of QDirIterator | ||
Description |
Certain file operations (like populating a file dialog from a directory containing a lot of files or expiring a QNetworkDiskCache) take *AGES*. Especially when the underlying file system doesn't have good caching capabilities. The following code: QDirIterator it("some_path"); while (it.hasNext()) { QString path = it.next(); } takes on a directory (HPFS) containing 3800 files about 50 seconds (!) to complete, while an opendir/readdir - loop finishes in 2..3 secs. On JFS the performance is better, but not great as well. Investigating... |