Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #26, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 27, 2015, 11:49:23 AM (10 years ago)
Author:
dmik

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #26, comment 10

    v1 v2  
    1010* dash 5-6 sec
    1111* bash 13-14 sec
     12* yash 11-12 sec
    1213
    1314It is expected to be faster since the CPU is 3 times faster. And bash is known to be much slower than simple ash-like shells. However, performance on OS/2 still sucks non-proportionally because of `fork()` emulation. We should still consider rewriting it using `spawn()` — it will require some work but not much, actually.
    1415
    1516Here are linux-world comparisons of bash and dash, just for reference: https://gist.github.com/mlafeldt/1663556 and http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/shell_script_mistakes.html.
     17
     18BTW, I added `yash` to the Mac comparison table. It shows results close to `bash` so I think I will not spend time on the OS/2 port of it right now.