#65 closed enhancement (fixed)
Split user added commands association, toolbar entries from FM2 base entries
Reported by: | Gregg Young | Owned by: | Gregg Young |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | Release_3.21 |
Component: | fm/2 base | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Move the base entries to code or ini file with their own assignment space (eg 4000-4100 are fm2 designated commands). Need an install process that can parse and split existing files. Should be able to edit parameters etc on FM2 commands. This would facilitate our updating of commands associations and toolboxes without effecting user modifications. Perhaps we should assign # at creation so that moving stuff around doesn't effect toolbars. I am not clear why commands like bldlevel, pstat and rmview aren't base commands
Change History (14)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Milestone: | → Release_3.5.9 |
---|
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Milestone: | Release_3.5.9 |
---|
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
Priority: | major → minor |
---|
I think a better way to do this would be to add sub menus with our commands. We could add a tool in the commands dialog to remove the duplicates from the root menu if the user wished. We should also update the command dialog so it will update the resource number on any user added icons in toolbars. We could just add a new .dat file for these. This would make it easy to do additional toolbars since we would assign the resource numbers and could even add icons to fm3res.dll for them. By using sub menus having duplicates would not be very noticeable and would solve the issue of user changes made to the base file. We could then add notebook page(s)(perhaps a separate commands notebook) where our additions could be removed or added to the menu by check boxes. We should check on startup that the files for each item is found and if not remove it from the menu.
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
blockedby: | → 186 |
---|---|
Milestone: | → Release_3.10 |
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:8 by , 17 years ago
Milestone: | Release_3.10 → Release_3.11 |
---|
comment:9 by , 16 years ago
Milestone: | Release_3.12 → Release_3.13 |
---|
comment:10 by , 16 years ago
Milestone: | Release_3.13 → Release_3.14 |
---|
comment:11 by , 16 years ago
Milestone: | Release_3.14 |
---|
comment:12 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | → Release_3.18 |
---|
comment:13 by , 12 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Moving associations and commands to the INI file has resolved the issues related to this ticket
comment:14 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | → Release_3.21 |
---|
customizations. I now believe the only practical way to do this is by
This is OK, but keep in mind that the INIs are a scarce resource. The profile manager code keeps the data for all INIs in shared memory and the buffer appears to be shared across all INIs.
OK.
OK.
OK.
OK.
Worst case we could implement some sort of renumbering scheme.
We probably need to revisit the UI design. A clone button can be useful to help save a lot of extra typing.
How do you plan to keep track of what's been deleted from the standard set by the user?
It's doable, but non-trivial. It's more of an algorithm problem than a data storage problem. Once you have a design that handles all the edge conditions, it's not going to matter whether the data is kept in the inis are in text files.