#144 closed defect (No Change Needed)
Question about APM.ADD
Reported by: | Chuck McKinnis | Owned by: | pasha |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | |
Component: | ACPI PSD | Version: | 3.03 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
It was discussed on the mailing list. But I'm opening a ticket, that we have history.
Why should APM.ADD be the first BASEDEV driver in the config.sys (at the top of the config.sys. Because the basedev drivers should not call APM$. APM.SYS from IBM also gets loaded after a device driver. It was never load order sensitiveI as far as I know.
Roderick
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
It's necessary find the users which have problems with APM.ADD position in config.sys
APM.ADD can't be embedded to ACPI.PSD because
- the developers refuse this suggestion
- no memory, it's necessary simplify acpi.psd
- we have spent N monthes to integration of pci scan to acpi.psd
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by
e-co:
OK, I was confident that it's important put APM.ADD to the top of CONFIG.SYS.
In the last few weeks I see that APM.ADD may be placed in the end of CONFIG.SYS,
So, let's find users which have the problem, then we can start the investigation.
You open ticket. Can you say where was problem, if apm.add set as last line in config.sys. Also I need in installed apm.add from debug directory and apm.log, which can produce by "copy apm$ apm.log"