54 | | '''A:''' The Samba Server provides a much better performance than all the older IBM products on a given hardware. The Samba Client is slower than the IBM LAN Requester. Resumee: Samba Server plus Samba client outperform any combination of IBM LAN Requester and IBM Peer/LAN Server/WSeB.[[BR]] |
| 54 | '''A:''' The Samba Server provides a much better performance than all the older IBM products on a given hardware. The Samba Client is slower than the IBM LAN Requester. Speedwise the order of possible combination is the following: |
| 55 | 1. Samba Server plus IBM LAN Requester (fastest) |
| 56 | 2. Samba Server plus Samba Client |
| 57 | 3. IBM Peer/LAN Server/WSeB plus IBM LAN Requester (slowest) |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ''Note: The combination IBM Peer/LAN Server/WSeB plus Samba Client is untested. It is probably the slowest and least stable combination anyway.'' |