Custom Query (344 matches)

I get this error.... ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:klusrmgr >= 1.2.2 is needed by libc-1:0.1.2-1.oc00.i686Please report this error at http://trac.netlabs.org/rpm/

I can't install the ghostscript packages, because a png16.dll can't be found.

[D:\]set lang=en-US

[D:\]yum install ghostscript
Failed to set locale, defaulting to C
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ghostscript.i386 0:9.10-3.oc00 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: urw-fonts >= 1.1 for package: ghostscript-9.10-3.oc00
.i386
--> Processing Dependency: png16.dll for package: ghostscript-9.10-3.oc00.i386
--> Processing Dependency: ghostscript-fonts for package: ghostscript-9.10-3.oc0
0.i386
--> Running transaction check
---> Package ghostscript.i386 0:9.10-3.oc00 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: png16.dll for package: ghostscript-9.10-3.oc00.i386
---> Package ghostscript-fonts.noarch 0:6.0-1.oc00 will be installed
---> Package urw-fonts.noarch 0:2.4-0.oc00 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: ghostscript-9.10-3.oc00.i386 (netlabs-rel)
           Requires: png16.dll
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

[D:\]

There exists only a png1616.dll. Could that cause the error?

[D:\]which -al png*.dll
h:\usr\lib\png1616.dll (also d:\mmos2\dll\pngio.dll) 2

[D:\]

As our collection of packages has grown, the need for better organization has become greater. Most of our packages utilize the Group tag, but I'm not clear as to what standard we follow. For example, Fedora has an optional Group tag, and ​few explicit categories, while openSUSE has a ​much more detailed list. Mageia has yet a different set of ​standard group tags. Some other packages of ours (virtual ones, such as the netlabs-rel, netlabs-exp, os2-base, os2-mpts) have no group tag at all.

YUMIE (still under development) has the ability to filter the package list based upon group, so this is a working example of where these tags will be used.

I'm happy to add the necessary page to the rpm wiki here once we agree on a reasonable standard (and it doesn't have to be one of the existing ones; for example, I would suggest a group of "Virtual" for the virtual packages).