Custom Query (344 matches)
Results (55 - 57 of 344)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #101 | fixed | Need to update wiki to reflect newer build of bootstrap package | ||
| Description |
I'm a bit confused concerning the newer bootstrap packages. In the repo directories, I see rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_4.wpi rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_5-i386.wpi rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_5-p4.wpi I've always been a bit confused regarding the proper arch for OS/2. Do I take the above literally, that if I actually have a Pentium 4 system I should use the p4 wpi and if I have something newer, I should use the i386 wpi? IAC, we should update the wiki to reflect the newer builds. I'm happy to do that, but I just need some guidance. |
|||
| #103 | fixed | libc-devel 0.6.6 ansidecl.h conflicts with version in binutils-devel 2.21-1 | ||
| Description |
I needed to uninstall binutils-devel in order to upgrade libc-devel: Transaction Check Error:
c00.i386 conflicts with file from package libc-devel-0.6.6-22.oc00.i386 Looks like we need to update binutils-devel (without getting to the libelf vs BFD thing). |
|||
| #105 | fixed | Description in netlabs-rel.spec is incorrect | ||
| Description |
Just noticed that the descriptions was copied/pasted from netlabs-exp.repo, and included the same warning about packages not being considered stable. I'm unsure as to the accepted practice for changing release number for fixes like this (nothing changed in the package). I've bumped the release, just in case. Diff attached. |
|||
