Custom Query (344 matches)
Results (40 - 42 of 344)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #99 | fixed | rebuilddb does not replace live database with temporary (fixed) database | ||
| Description |
I've found: [c:\]rpm --rebuilddb error: temporary database /@unixroot/var/lib/rpm.rebuild already exists Renaming rpm.rebuild and re-running works exactly once, leaving behind the temporary database dir, requiring manual cleanup. |
|||
| #100 | wontfix | Unable to update to rpm-libs 4.8.1-19 and urpo 20150101-9 | ||
| Description |
We seem to have a problem making the upgrade: Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Updating : urpo-20150101-9.oc00.i386 1/4 Error unpacking rpm package urpo-20150101-9.oc00.i386 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /@unixroot/usr/lib/urpo.dll: cpio: ch own Updating : rpm-libs-4.8.1-19.oc00.i386 2/4 Error unpacking rpm package rpm-libs-4.8.1-19.oc00.i386 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /@unixroot/usr/lib/rpm.dll: cpio: cho wn urpo-20141223-7.oc00.i386 was supposed to be removed but is not! rpm-libs-4.8.1-18.oc00.i386 was supposed to be removed but is not! yum.log says: Jan 01 22:19:15 urpo-20150101-9.oc00.i386: 100 Jan 01 22:19:24 Updated: rpm-4.8.1-19.oc00.i386 Jan 01 22:19:24 rpm-libs-4.8.1-19.oc00.i386: 100 Jan 01 22:19:33 Updated: rpm-build-4.8.1-19.oc00.i386 Jan 01 22:19:34 Updated: urpo-devel-20150101-9.oc00.i386 Jan 01 22:19:34 urpo-devel: ts_done name in te is rpm-libs should be urpo-devel (not much help in the log) There does not appear to be anything wrong with the rpms themselves. I see this on multiple systems, too. As a result of multiple attempts, I am left with: 12-23-14 14:10 3,072 124 ___A_ urpo.dll 1-01-15 22:19 3,207 124 ___A_ urpo.dll;54a60e33 1-01-15 22:20 3,207 124 ___A_ urpo.dll;54a60e70 1-01-15 22:21 3,207 124 ___A_ urpo.dll;54a60ed4 1-01-15 22:40 3,207 124 ___A_ urpo.dll;54a61346 though I do seem to have ended up with the correct rpm.dll, somehow: 1-01-15 22:42 268,875 124 ___A_ rpm.dll 1-01-15 22:19 268,875 124 ___A_ rpm.dll;54a60e33 1-01-15 22:20 268,875 124 ___A_ rpm.dll;54a60e70 1-01-15 22:21 268,875 124 ___A_ rpm.dll;54a60ed4 |
|||
| #101 | fixed | Need to update wiki to reflect newer build of bootstrap package | ||
| Description |
I'm a bit confused concerning the newer bootstrap packages. In the repo directories, I see rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_4.wpi rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_5-i386.wpi rpm-yum-bootstrap-1_5-p4.wpi I've always been a bit confused regarding the proper arch for OS/2. Do I take the above literally, that if I actually have a Pentium 4 system I should use the p4 wpi and if I have something newer, I should use the i386 wpi? IAC, we should update the wiki to reflect the newer builds. I'm happy to do that, but I just need some guidance. |
|||
